User login
Archives
| January 2009 | ||||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
| January 2009 | ||||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |

RSS Feed
Re: English Curriculum Tags
consensus for dissensus. I like that idea. It makes me wonder if the urge to create coherency is misplaced. I just want there to be some kind of a story that comes out of spending two and half years studying English. Surprisingly, there is a good deal of comity among the group here. As you say, though, that is based mostly on the premise that nobody steps on anyone elses toes. At bottom we all want to do right by the students in the program, I think, so that will be a good lever. I'm going to push the tag approach and see what happens.